Administrative Law as a Dual State. Authoritarian Elements of Administrative Law
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abstract Scholars have recently shown how in Europe regimes democratic decay (e.g. Poland, Hungary) take all sorts of measures targeting and marginalizing political opponents. Although they are authoritarian by nature, the cast a legal form. According to some scholars this kind rule law can be best understood as dual state, namely combination normative state (the law) prerogative pure—political or arbitrary—will those power). Building on these insights, present paper makes two new observations. First, administrative is distinctively well suited cater for creation state. By I mean better than civil criminal law. In fact, argue that constitutes itself combining elements within single area law, ways cannot done under Second, not only but also liberal democracies make use nature The illustrates point with techniques whereby circumvent pervert normal operation crimmigration alien detention citizens. My underlying draw attention inherent potential
منابع مشابه
Ordinary Administrative Law as Constitutional Common Law
Henry Monaghan famously argued that much of constitutional interpretation takes the form of what he termed constitutional common law, a body of doctrines and rules that are constitutionally inspired but not constitutionally required and that can be altered or reversed by Congress. This Essay argues that a fair amount of ordinary administrative law qualifies as constitutional common law: Constit...
متن کاملPathology of Administrative Law in Nursing Practices
Introduction Nurses' behaviors and behaviors and decisions in the field of their activities, like other government employees, are emerging in the functioning of the state. These acts and behaviors are governed by the principles that are known as the principles governing administration. These principles, which include must and do not, are the behavior and services of the nurses Under the rule o...
متن کاملDepoliticizing Administrative Law
A large body of empirical evidence demonstrates that judicial review of agency action is highly politicized, in the sense that Republican appointees are significantly more likely to invalidate liberal agency decisions than conservative ones, while Democratic appointees are significantly more likely to invalidate conservative agency decisions than liberal ones. These results hold for both (a) ju...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Hague Journal on The Rule of Law
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['1876-4053', '1876-4045']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-021-00156-4